Civitascope / Living conditions
Search Magyar

Who cannot pay an unexpected expense in the EU

Topic: Living conditions

In Greece, 50.5% of people live in a household that could not pay an unexpected expense from its own resources, against 15.3% in the Netherlands.

In 2025, 29.2% of people in the EU lived in a household that could not pay an unexpected, required expense from its own resources. The amount is one twelfth of the country's yearly at-risk-of-poverty threshold for a single person. Households say this themselves in a survey.

Figures for:
2025.
Covers:
the time of the survey.
New data:
once a year.
Dataset updated:
20 October 2026.

Published 6 November 2026

27 / 27 EU countries ranked

The ranking

In 2025, the share of people whose household could not pay an unexpected expense from its own resources ranged from 15.3% in the Netherlands to 50.5% in Greece.

Share of people whose household could not pay an unexpected expense from its own resources, %

2025
0204060%
EU, 29.2 %
Rank 1: Greece, 50.5 %
Rank 2: Latvia, 43.7 %
Rank 3: Bulgaria, 42.4 %
Rank 4: Lithuania, 41.1 %
Rank 5: Romania, 37.8 %
Rank 6: Spain, 36.4 %
Rank 7: Estonia, 36.0 %
Rank 8: Cyprus, 32.0 %
Rank 9: Germany, 31.9 %
Rank 10: Croatia, 31.2 %
Rank 11: Ireland, 30.6 %
Rank 12: Hungary, 30.5 %
Rank 13: Portugal, 29.2 %
Rank 14: France, 28.8 %
Rank 15: Finland, 28.0 %
Rank 16: Slovakia, 26.0 %
Rank 17: Italy, 25.6 %
Rank 18: Slovenia, 23.9 %
Rank 19: Sweden, 23.0 %
Rank 20: Poland, 22.5 %
Rank 21: Belgium, 22.1 %
Rank 22: Luxembourg, 21.8 %
Rank 23: Austria, 20.9 %
Rank 24: Denmark, 20.1 %
Rank 25: Czechia, 18.7 %
Rank 25: Malta, 18.7 %
Rank 27: Netherlands, 15.3 %
How to read: bars start at zero. Every country with a value is shown, ranked from highest to lowest.Source: Eurostat, Inability to face unexpected financial expenses (ilc_mdes04).Chart: Civitascope (civitascope.eu) · CC BY 4.0 · Download image · Download data ·

Below and above the at-risk-of-poverty threshold

Among people above the at-risk-of-poverty threshold, the spread across countries was narrower. The Netherlands was again the lowest, at 10.9%, and Greece again the highest, at 38.6%. The gap was 27.7 percentage points.

Among people at risk of poverty, the spread across countries was much wider than among people above the at-risk-of-poverty threshold. Greece was again the highest, at 99.9%, and Malta the lowest, at 37.7%. The gap between Greece and Malta was 62.2 percentage points.

Share of people whose household could not pay an unexpected expense from its own resources: above the threshold and at risk of poverty, %

2025
Above the thresholdAt risk of povertyAt risk of poverty − above the thresholdDifference
20406080100pp
EU, Above the threshold: 23.0 %, At risk of poverty: 61.2 %, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +38.2
Rank 1: Greece, Above the threshold: 38.6 %, At risk of poverty: 99.9 %, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +61.3
Rank 2: Romania, Above the threshold: 29.6 %, At risk of poverty: 74.4 %, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +44.8
Rank 3: Bulgaria, Above the threshold: 33.9 %, At risk of poverty: 74.2 %, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +40.3
Rank 4: Lithuania, Above the threshold: 32.8 %, At risk of poverty: 69.4 %, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +36.6
Rank 5: Cyprus, Above the threshold: 25.5 %, At risk of poverty: 68.8 %, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +43.3
Rank 6: Latvia, Above the threshold: 36.7 %, At risk of poverty: 68.4 %, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +31.7
Rank 7: Hungary, Above the threshold: 24.7 %, At risk of poverty: 66.4 %, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +41.7
Rank 8: France, Above the threshold: 21.6 %, At risk of poverty: 65.9 %, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +44.3
Rank 9: Germany, Above the threshold: 25.7 %, At risk of poverty: 64.5 %, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +38.8
Rank 10: Spain, Above the threshold: 30.1 %, At risk of poverty: 62.5 %, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +32.4
Rank 11: Estonia, Above the threshold: 29.6 %, At risk of poverty: 62.2 %, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +32.6
Rank 12: Finland, Above the threshold: 22.8 %, At risk of poverty: 61.6 %, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +38.8
Rank 13: Belgium, Above the threshold: 17.5 %, At risk of poverty: 60.1 %, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +42.6
Rank 14: Ireland, Above the threshold: 26.2 %, At risk of poverty: 59.9 %, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +33.7
Rank 15: Portugal, Above the threshold: 23.7 %, At risk of poverty: 59.8 %, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +36.1
Rank 16: Czechia, Above the threshold: 14.4 %, At risk of poverty: 59.7 %, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +45.3
Rank 17: Croatia, Above the threshold: 24.6 %, At risk of poverty: 58.0 %, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +33.4
Rank 18: Slovakia, Above the threshold: 21.8 %, At risk of poverty: 56.7 %, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +34.9
Rank 19: Sweden, Above the threshold: 17.3 %, At risk of poverty: 55.0 %, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +37.7
Rank 20: Slovenia, Above the threshold: 19.1 %, At risk of poverty: 53.1 %, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +34.0
Rank 21: Austria, Above the threshold: 15.1 %, At risk of poverty: 51.2 %, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +36.1
Rank 22: Italy, Above the threshold: 19.9 %, At risk of poverty: 50.6 %, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +30.7
Rank 23: Luxembourg, Above the threshold: 17.2 %, At risk of poverty: 49.6 %, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +32.4
Rank 24: Poland, Above the threshold: 18.7 %, At risk of poverty: 47.7 %, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +29.0
Rank 25: Netherlands, Above the threshold: 10.9 %, At risk of poverty: 45.6 %, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +34.7
Rank 26: Denmark, Above the threshold: 17.7 %, At risk of poverty: 37.9 %, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +20.2
Rank 27: Malta, Above the threshold: 14.8 %, At risk of poverty: 37.7 %, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +22.9
How to read: the filled dot is at risk of poverty, the outlined dot above the threshold, each with its value beside it. The column on the right is their difference, at risk of poverty − above the threshold. Countries are ranked by at risk of poverty.Source: Eurostat, Inability to face unexpected financial expenses (ilc_mdes04).Chart: Civitascope (civitascope.eu) · CC BY 4.0 · Download image · Download data ·
EveryoneAbove the thresholdAt risk of poverty
Lowest15.3%the Netherlands10.9%the Netherlands37.7%Malta
Highest50.5%Greece38.6%Greece99.9%Greece
Highest − lowest35.2 pp27.7 pp62.2 pp

Everyone

Lowest: 15.3% (the Netherlands)Highest: 50.5% (Greece)Highest − lowest: 35.2 pp

Above the threshold

Lowest: 10.9% (the Netherlands)Highest: 38.6% (Greece)Highest − lowest: 27.7 pp

At risk of poverty

Lowest: 37.7% (Malta)Highest: 99.9% (Greece)Highest − lowest: 62.2 pp

Household types

In 2025, 53.7% of people in single-parent households in the EU could not pay an unexpected expense from their own resources, against 21.9% of people in households of two adults without dependent children.

Share of people whose household could not pay an unexpected expense from its own resources, by household type, %

2025
everyonealone, under 65alone, 65+single parent2 adults, 3+ children2 adults, no children
EU, everyone: 29.2 %,alone, under 65: 38.5 %,alone, 65+: 34.5 %,single parent: 53.7 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 38.6 %,2 adults, no children: 21.9 %,
Rank 1: Greece, everyone: 50.5 %,alone, under 65: 58.2 %,alone, 65+: 66.4 %,single parent: 76.3 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 58.9 %,2 adults, no children: 45.3 %,
Rank 2: Latvia, everyone: 43.7 %,alone, under 65: 49.4 %,alone, 65+: 65.2 %,single parent: 57.7 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 41.0 %,2 adults, no children: 41.9 %,
Rank 3: Bulgaria, everyone: 42.4 %,alone, under 65: 45.4 %,alone, 65+: 65.9 %,single parent: 60.0 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 60.6 %,2 adults, no children: 42.7 %,
Rank 4: Lithuania, everyone: 41.1 %,alone, under 65: 44.6 %,alone, 65+: 59.1 %,single parent: 49.7 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 44.4 %,2 adults, no children: 41.9 %,
Rank 5: Romania, everyone: 37.8 %,alone, under 65: 47.1 %,alone, 65+: 66.2 %,single parent: 57.9 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 56.9 %,2 adults, no children: 33.0 %,
Rank 6: Spain, everyone: 36.4 %,alone, under 65: 43.1 %,alone, 65+: 34.3 %,single parent: 56.3 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 50.3 %,2 adults, no children: 28.9 %,
Rank 7: Estonia, everyone: 36.0 %,alone, under 65: 42.1 %,alone, 65+: 48.7 %,single parent: 62.7 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 39.0 %,2 adults, no children: 28.6 %,
Rank 8: Cyprus, everyone: 32.0 %,alone, under 65: 35.1 %,alone, 65+: 36.5 %,single parent: 59.3 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 36.3 %,2 adults, no children: 29.4 %,
Rank 9: Germany, everyone: 31.9 %,alone, under 65: 44.7 %,alone, 65+: 31.5 %,single parent: 58.5 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 42.6 %,2 adults, no children: 23.0 %,
Rank 10: Croatia, everyone: 31.2 %,alone, under 65: 39.1 %,alone, 65+: 63.2 %,single parent: 39.5 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 30.7 %,2 adults, no children: 40.7 %,
Rank 11: Ireland, everyone: 30.6 %,alone, under 65: 37.2 %,alone, 65+: 33.9 %,single parent: 76.2 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 34.5 %,2 adults, no children: 20.9 %,
Rank 12: Hungary, everyone: 30.5 %,alone, under 65: 33.1 %,alone, 65+: 41.5 %,single parent: 47.6 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 35.6 %,2 adults, no children: 24.5 %,
Rank 13: Portugal, everyone: 29.2 %,alone, under 65: 37.5 %,alone, 65+: 39.7 %,single parent: 54.6 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 31.3 %,2 adults, no children: 27.0 %,
Rank 14: France, everyone: 28.8 %,alone, under 65: 35.0 %,alone, 65+: 26.0 %,single parent: 58.5 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 42.5 %,2 adults, no children: 17.0 %,
Rank 15: Finland, everyone: 28.0 %,alone, under 65: 48.4 %,alone, 65+: 26.4 %,single parent: 55.0 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 33.3 %,2 adults, no children: 16.4 %,
Rank 16: Slovakia, everyone: 26.0 %,alone, under 65: 27.8 %,alone, 65+: 48.3 %,single parent: 47.6 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 30.6 %,2 adults, no children: 27.9 %,
Rank 17: Italy, everyone: 25.6 %,alone, under 65: 32.3 %,alone, 65+: 34.2 %,single parent: 42.5 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 36.7 %,2 adults, no children: 20.7 %,
Rank 18: Slovenia, everyone: 23.9 %,alone, under 65: 37.9 %,alone, 65+: 46.2 %,single parent: 50.7 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 19.7 %,2 adults, no children: 23.3 %,
Rank 19: Sweden, everyone: 23.0 %,alone, under 65: 34.8 %,alone, 65+: 17.7 %,single parent: 46.6 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 28.8 %,2 adults, no children: 13.6 %,
Rank 20: Poland, everyone: 22.5 %,alone, under 65: 27.9 %,alone, 65+: 46.2 %,single parent: 48.8 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 26.6 %,2 adults, no children: 21.1 %,
Rank 21: Belgium, everyone: 22.1 %,alone, under 65: 34.4 %,alone, 65+: 20.5 %,single parent: 49.1 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 30.0 %,2 adults, no children: 11.5 %,
Rank 22: Luxembourg, everyone: 21.8 %,alone, under 65: 29.7 %,alone, 65+: 11.6 %,single parent: 40.8 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 29.5 %,2 adults, no children: 13.7 %,
Rank 23: Austria, everyone: 20.9 %,alone, under 65: 31.2 %,alone, 65+: 24.5 %,single parent: 44.7 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 24.2 %,2 adults, no children: 12.0 %,
Rank 24: Denmark, everyone: 20.1 %,alone, under 65: 35.4 %,alone, 65+: 18.1 %,single parent: 42.7 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 27.7 %,2 adults, no children: 14.5 %,
Rank 25: Czechia, everyone: 18.7 %,alone, under 65: 23.2 %,alone, 65+: 25.7 %,single parent: 47.6 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 30.7 %,2 adults, no children: 12.4 %,
Rank 25: Malta, everyone: 18.7 %,alone, under 65: 32.2 %,alone, 65+: 21.1 %,single parent: 44.7 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 23.6 %,2 adults, no children: 14.6 %,
Rank 27: Netherlands, everyone: 15.3 %,alone, under 65: 30.0 %,alone, 65+: 16.5 %,single parent: 37.9 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 14.3 %,2 adults, no children: 9.2 %,
everyonealone, under 65alone, 65+single parent
EU, everyone: 29.2 %,alone, under 65: 38.5 %,alone, 65+: 34.5 %,single parent: 53.7 %,
Rank 1: Greece, everyone: 50.5 %,alone, under 65: 58.2 %,alone, 65+: 66.4 %,single parent: 76.3 %,
Rank 2: Latvia, everyone: 43.7 %,alone, under 65: 49.4 %,alone, 65+: 65.2 %,single parent: 57.7 %,
Rank 3: Bulgaria, everyone: 42.4 %,alone, under 65: 45.4 %,alone, 65+: 65.9 %,single parent: 60.0 %,
Rank 4: Lithuania, everyone: 41.1 %,alone, under 65: 44.6 %,alone, 65+: 59.1 %,single parent: 49.7 %,
Rank 5: Romania, everyone: 37.8 %,alone, under 65: 47.1 %,alone, 65+: 66.2 %,single parent: 57.9 %,
Rank 6: Spain, everyone: 36.4 %,alone, under 65: 43.1 %,alone, 65+: 34.3 %,single parent: 56.3 %,
Rank 7: Estonia, everyone: 36.0 %,alone, under 65: 42.1 %,alone, 65+: 48.7 %,single parent: 62.7 %,
Rank 8: Cyprus, everyone: 32.0 %,alone, under 65: 35.1 %,alone, 65+: 36.5 %,single parent: 59.3 %,
Rank 9: Germany, everyone: 31.9 %,alone, under 65: 44.7 %,alone, 65+: 31.5 %,single parent: 58.5 %,
Rank 10: Croatia, everyone: 31.2 %,alone, under 65: 39.1 %,alone, 65+: 63.2 %,single parent: 39.5 %,
Rank 11: Ireland, everyone: 30.6 %,alone, under 65: 37.2 %,alone, 65+: 33.9 %,single parent: 76.2 %,
Rank 12: Hungary, everyone: 30.5 %,alone, under 65: 33.1 %,alone, 65+: 41.5 %,single parent: 47.6 %,
Rank 13: Portugal, everyone: 29.2 %,alone, under 65: 37.5 %,alone, 65+: 39.7 %,single parent: 54.6 %,
Rank 14: France, everyone: 28.8 %,alone, under 65: 35.0 %,alone, 65+: 26.0 %,single parent: 58.5 %,
Rank 15: Finland, everyone: 28.0 %,alone, under 65: 48.4 %,alone, 65+: 26.4 %,single parent: 55.0 %,
Rank 16: Slovakia, everyone: 26.0 %,alone, under 65: 27.8 %,alone, 65+: 48.3 %,single parent: 47.6 %,
Rank 17: Italy, everyone: 25.6 %,alone, under 65: 32.3 %,alone, 65+: 34.2 %,single parent: 42.5 %,
Rank 18: Slovenia, everyone: 23.9 %,alone, under 65: 37.9 %,alone, 65+: 46.2 %,single parent: 50.7 %,
Rank 19: Sweden, everyone: 23.0 %,alone, under 65: 34.8 %,alone, 65+: 17.7 %,single parent: 46.6 %,
Rank 20: Poland, everyone: 22.5 %,alone, under 65: 27.9 %,alone, 65+: 46.2 %,single parent: 48.8 %,
Rank 21: Belgium, everyone: 22.1 %,alone, under 65: 34.4 %,alone, 65+: 20.5 %,single parent: 49.1 %,
Rank 22: Luxembourg, everyone: 21.8 %,alone, under 65: 29.7 %,alone, 65+: 11.6 %,single parent: 40.8 %,
Rank 23: Austria, everyone: 20.9 %,alone, under 65: 31.2 %,alone, 65+: 24.5 %,single parent: 44.7 %,
Rank 24: Denmark, everyone: 20.1 %,alone, under 65: 35.4 %,alone, 65+: 18.1 %,single parent: 42.7 %,
Rank 25: Czechia, everyone: 18.7 %,alone, under 65: 23.2 %,alone, 65+: 25.7 %,single parent: 47.6 %,
Rank 25: Malta, everyone: 18.7 %,alone, under 65: 32.2 %,alone, 65+: 21.1 %,single parent: 44.7 %,
Rank 27: Netherlands, everyone: 15.3 %,alone, under 65: 30.0 %,alone, 65+: 16.5 %,single parent: 37.9 %,
everyone2 adults, 3+ children2 adults, no children
EU, everyone: 29.2 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 38.6 %,2 adults, no children: 21.9 %,
Rank 1: Greece, everyone: 50.5 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 58.9 %,2 adults, no children: 45.3 %,
Rank 2: Latvia, everyone: 43.7 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 41.0 %,2 adults, no children: 41.9 %,
Rank 3: Bulgaria, everyone: 42.4 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 60.6 %,2 adults, no children: 42.7 %,
Rank 4: Lithuania, everyone: 41.1 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 44.4 %,2 adults, no children: 41.9 %,
Rank 5: Romania, everyone: 37.8 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 56.9 %,2 adults, no children: 33.0 %,
Rank 6: Spain, everyone: 36.4 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 50.3 %,2 adults, no children: 28.9 %,
Rank 7: Estonia, everyone: 36.0 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 39.0 %,2 adults, no children: 28.6 %,
Rank 8: Cyprus, everyone: 32.0 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 36.3 %,2 adults, no children: 29.4 %,
Rank 9: Germany, everyone: 31.9 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 42.6 %,2 adults, no children: 23.0 %,
Rank 10: Croatia, everyone: 31.2 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 30.7 %,2 adults, no children: 40.7 %,
Rank 11: Ireland, everyone: 30.6 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 34.5 %,2 adults, no children: 20.9 %,
Rank 12: Hungary, everyone: 30.5 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 35.6 %,2 adults, no children: 24.5 %,
Rank 13: Portugal, everyone: 29.2 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 31.3 %,2 adults, no children: 27.0 %,
Rank 14: France, everyone: 28.8 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 42.5 %,2 adults, no children: 17.0 %,
Rank 15: Finland, everyone: 28.0 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 33.3 %,2 adults, no children: 16.4 %,
Rank 16: Slovakia, everyone: 26.0 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 30.6 %,2 adults, no children: 27.9 %,
Rank 17: Italy, everyone: 25.6 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 36.7 %,2 adults, no children: 20.7 %,
Rank 18: Slovenia, everyone: 23.9 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 19.7 %,2 adults, no children: 23.3 %,
Rank 19: Sweden, everyone: 23.0 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 28.8 %,2 adults, no children: 13.6 %,
Rank 20: Poland, everyone: 22.5 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 26.6 %,2 adults, no children: 21.1 %,
Rank 21: Belgium, everyone: 22.1 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 30.0 %,2 adults, no children: 11.5 %,
Rank 22: Luxembourg, everyone: 21.8 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 29.5 %,2 adults, no children: 13.7 %,
Rank 23: Austria, everyone: 20.9 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 24.2 %,2 adults, no children: 12.0 %,
Rank 24: Denmark, everyone: 20.1 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 27.7 %,2 adults, no children: 14.5 %,
Rank 25: Czechia, everyone: 18.7 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 30.7 %,2 adults, no children: 12.4 %,
Rank 25: Malta, everyone: 18.7 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 23.6 %,2 adults, no children: 14.6 %,
Rank 27: Netherlands, everyone: 15.3 %,2 adults, 3+ children: 14.3 %,2 adults, no children: 9.2 %,
How to read: one row per country, one column per group, each value in its cell. The stronger the colour, the higher the value. Countries are ranked by the “everyone” column.Source: Eurostat, Inability to face unexpected financial expenses (ilc_mdes04).Chart: Civitascope (civitascope.eu) · CC BY 4.0 · Download image · Download data ·

About the data

The share of people living in households that say they could not pay an unexpected, required expense of a set amount from their own resources. The amount is one twelfth of the country's yearly at-risk-of-poverty threshold for a single person.

Eurostat: “The inability to face unexpected financial expenses refers to the percentage of persons in the total population who are in the state of enforced inability to face unexpected financial expenses.” (source)

EU statistics on income and living conditions (EU-SILC), a yearly sample survey of households run by the national statistical institutes. The answer is the household respondent's own assessment.

How to read these numbers

How it is measured

The survey covers people living in private households. People in collective households and institutions are generally not included (Estonia includes collective households).

The expense asked about differs between countries. It is one twelfth of each country's at-risk-of-poverty threshold for a single person, from the survey two years earlier, whatever the size of the household. The figure is what households say about themselves.

Paying from own resources means without asking anyone for financial help and without the household's debts getting worse. Paying in instalments or with a loan an expense that the household used to pay in cash does not count. Examples of such expenses are surgery, a funeral, major repairs in the house or replacing a washing machine or a car.

France's figures cover the European part of the country and, since 2022, four overseas departments (Guadeloupe, Martinique, French Guiana and Réunion). Mayotte is not included. Portugal's figures include the Azores and Madeira, and Cyprus's cover the government-controlled areas.

Provisional figures

A provisional value (flag p) may still be revised. This concerns Lithuania (2025).

Sources and data

Eurostat, Inability to face unexpected financial expenses (ilc_mdes04). Data updated 20 October 2026, retrieved 6 November 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.

Eurostat metadata · Eurostat methodology

The exact Eurostat API query

https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/api/dissemination/statistics/1.0/data/ilc_mdes04?format=JSON&lang=en&freq=A&geo=AT&geo=BE&geo=BG&geo=CY&geo=CZ&geo=DE&geo=DK&geo=EE&geo=EL&geo=ES&geo=EU27_2020&geo=FI&geo=FR&geo=HR&geo=HU&geo=IE&geo=IT&geo=LT&geo=LU&geo=LV&geo=MT&geo=NL&geo=PL&geo=PT&geo=RO&geo=SE&geo=SI&geo=SK&hhcomp=TOTAL&rskpovth=TOTAL&unit=PC

How every number in this story was computed

Related stories

All stories in Living conditions