Magyar

Overcrowded homes

Topic: Housing

40.4% of people in Romania live in an overcrowded home, against 2.2% in Cyprus.

In 2025, 16.8% of people in the EU lived in an overcrowded home. A home is overcrowded when it has fewer rooms than the household's size and make-up need.

Figures for:
2025.
Covers:
the time of the survey.
New data:
once a year.
Dataset updated:
20 October 2026.

The ranking

In 2025, the share of people living in an overcrowded home ranged from 2.2% in Cyprus to 40.4% in Romania.

Share of people living in an overcrowded home, %

2025
01020304050%
Rank 1: Romania, 40.4 %
Rank 2: Latvia, 38.9 %
Rank 3: Bulgaria, 32.5 %
Rank 4: Croatia, 31.8 %
Rank 5: Poland, 30.9 %
Rank 6: Greece, 28.3 %
Rank 7: Lithuania, 27.8 %
Rank 7: Slovakia, 27.8 %
Rank 9: Italy, 24.3 %
Rank 10: Estonia, 17.9 %
Rank 11: Czechia, 16.7 %
Rank 12: Sweden, 15.7 %
Rank 13: Hungary, 14.6 %
Rank 14: Austria, 14.2 %
Rank 15: Portugal, 12.7 %
Rank 16: Germany, 11.7 %
Rank 17: France, 10.8 %
Rank 18: Slovenia, 10.5 %
Rank 19: Denmark, 9.9 %
Rank 20: Spain, 9.5 %
Rank 20: Finland, 9.5 %
Rank 22: Luxembourg, 8.8 %
Rank 23: Belgium, 6.6 %
Rank 24: Ireland, 5.4 %
Rank 25: Malta, 4.7 %
Rank 26: Netherlands, 4.1 %
Rank 27: Cyprus, 2.2 %
How to read: bars start at zero. Every country with a value is shown, ranked from highest to lowest.Source: Eurostat, Overcrowding rate by age, sex and poverty status - total population (ilc_lvho05a).Chart: Civitascope · CC BY 4.0Download image ·

Poverty risk and crowded homes

Among people not at risk of poverty, the gap was narrower. It ranged from 1.2% in Cyprus to 37.9% in Latvia. The gap was 36.7 percentage points.

Among people at risk of poverty, the gap was wider. It ranged from 7.6% in Cyprus to 52.6% in Romania. The gap was 45.0 percentage points.

Share of people living in an overcrowded home: not at risk of poverty and at risk of poverty

2025
Not at risk of povertyAt risk of povertyAt risk of poverty − not at risk of povertyDifference
02040%
Rank 1: Romania, Not at risk of poverty: 37.7 %, At risk of poverty: 52.6 %, At risk of poverty − not at risk of poverty: +14.9
Rank 2: Slovakia, Not at risk of poverty: 24.4 %, At risk of poverty: 52.1 %, At risk of poverty − not at risk of poverty: +27.7
Rank 3: Latvia, Not at risk of poverty: 37.9 %, At risk of poverty: 42.2 %, At risk of poverty − not at risk of poverty: +4.3
Rank 4: Sweden, Not at risk of poverty: 11.0 %, At risk of poverty: 41.2 %, At risk of poverty − not at risk of poverty: +30.2
Rank 5: Bulgaria, Not at risk of poverty: 30.4 %, At risk of poverty: 40.3 %, At risk of poverty − not at risk of poverty: +9.9
Rank 6: Czechia, Not at risk of poverty: 14.2 %, At risk of poverty: 39.9 %, At risk of poverty − not at risk of poverty: +25.7
Rank 7: Poland, Not at risk of poverty: 29.8 %, At risk of poverty: 38.2 %, At risk of poverty − not at risk of poverty: +8.4
Rank 8: Austria, Not at risk of poverty: 9.8 %, At risk of poverty: 37.5 %, At risk of poverty − not at risk of poverty: +27.7
Rank 9: Greece, Not at risk of poverty: 26.6 %, At risk of poverty: 35.3 %, At risk of poverty − not at risk of poverty: +8.7
Rank 10: Italy, Not at risk of poverty: 21.8 %, At risk of poverty: 35.2 %, At risk of poverty − not at risk of poverty: +13.4
Rank 11: Finland, Not at risk of poverty: 6.2 %, At risk of poverty: 30.5 %, At risk of poverty − not at risk of poverty: +24.3
Rank 12: Hungary, Not at risk of poverty: 12.3 %, At risk of poverty: 28.7 %, At risk of poverty − not at risk of poverty: +16.4
Rank 13: France, Not at risk of poverty: 7.6 %, At risk of poverty: 27.5 %, At risk of poverty − not at risk of poverty: +19.9
Rank 14: Germany, Not at risk of poverty: 8.8 %, At risk of poverty: 27.4 %, At risk of poverty − not at risk of poverty: +18.6
Rank 15: Estonia, Not at risk of poverty: 15.7 %, At risk of poverty: 27.3 %, At risk of poverty − not at risk of poverty: +11.6
Rank 16: Croatia, At risk of poverty: 26.9 %, Not at risk of poverty: 33.0 %, At risk of poverty − not at risk of poverty: −6.1
Rank 17: Lithuania, At risk of poverty: 25.8 %, Not at risk of poverty: 28.4 %, At risk of poverty − not at risk of poverty: −2.6
Rank 18: Denmark, Not at risk of poverty: 7.8 %, At risk of poverty: 25.7 %, At risk of poverty − not at risk of poverty: +17.9
Rank 19: Belgium, Not at risk of poverty: 4.6 %, At risk of poverty: 22.8 %, At risk of poverty − not at risk of poverty: +18.2
Rank 20: Luxembourg, Not at risk of poverty: 6.4 %, At risk of poverty: 22.6 %, At risk of poverty − not at risk of poverty: +16.2
Rank 21: Portugal, Not at risk of poverty: 11.1 %, At risk of poverty: 21.3 %, At risk of poverty − not at risk of poverty: +10.2
Rank 22: Spain, Not at risk of poverty: 7.4 %, At risk of poverty: 17.9 %, At risk of poverty − not at risk of poverty: +10.5
Rank 23: Slovenia, Not at risk of poverty: 9.5 %, At risk of poverty: 16.3 %, At risk of poverty − not at risk of poverty: +6.8
Rank 24: Netherlands, Not at risk of poverty: 2.8 %, At risk of poverty: 13.4 %, At risk of poverty − not at risk of poverty: +10.6
Rank 25: Ireland, Not at risk of poverty: 4.5 %, At risk of poverty: 11.4 %, At risk of poverty − not at risk of poverty: +6.9
Rank 26: Malta, Not at risk of poverty: 4.1 %, At risk of poverty: 7.7 %, At risk of poverty − not at risk of poverty: +3.6
Rank 27: Cyprus, Not at risk of poverty: 1.2 %, At risk of poverty: 7.6 %, At risk of poverty − not at risk of poverty: +6.4
How to read: the filled dot is at risk of poverty, the outlined dot not at risk of poverty, each with its value beside it. The column on the right is their difference, at risk of poverty − not at risk of poverty. Countries are ranked by at risk of poverty.Source: Eurostat, Overcrowding rate by age, sex and poverty status - total population (ilc_lvho05a).Chart: Civitascope · CC BY 4.0Download image ·
EveryoneNot at risk of povertyAt risk of poverty
Lowest2.2%Cyprus1.2%Cyprus7.6%Cyprus
Highest40.4%Romania37.9%Latvia52.6%Romania
Highest − lowest38.2 pp36.7 pp45.0 pp

Everyone

Lowest: 2.2% (Cyprus)Highest: 40.4% (Romania)Highest − lowest: 38.2 pp

Not at risk of poverty

Lowest: 1.2% (Cyprus)Highest: 37.9% (Latvia)Highest − lowest: 36.7 pp

At risk of poverty

Lowest: 7.6% (Cyprus)Highest: 52.6% (Romania)Highest − lowest: 45.0 pp

Children and older people

In the EU, 29.8% of people aged 12 to 17 lived in an overcrowded home, against 6.2% of people aged 65 or over.

Share of people living in an overcrowded home, by age, %

2025
allunder 66–1112–1718–6465+
EU, all: 16.8 %,under 6: 21.7 %,6–11: 23.7 %,12–17: 29.8 %,18–64: 18.1 %,65+: 6.2 %,
Rank 1: Romania, all: 40.4 %,under 6: 59.8 %,6–11: 57.9 %,12–17: 65.3 %,18–64: 42.7 %,65+: 14.2 %,
Rank 2: Latvia, all: 38.9 %,under 6: 49.5 %,6–11: 49.4 %,12–17: 56.7 %,18–64: 39.2 %,65+: 26.0 %,
Rank 3: Bulgaria, all: 32.5 %,under 6: 50.7 %,6–11: 48.0 %,12–17: 58.7 %,18–64: 34.6 %,65+: 12.4 %,
Rank 4: Croatia, all: 31.8 %,under 6: 40.7 %,6–11: 36.1 %,12–17: 50.8 %,18–64: 34.3 %,65+: 16.6 %,
Rank 5: Poland, all: 30.9 %,under 6: 37.8 %,6–11: 37.0 %,12–17: 45.6 %,18–64: 31.7 %,65+: 20.4 %,
Rank 6: Greece, all: 28.3 %,under 6: 32.7 %,6–11: 43.0 %,12–17: 49.4 %,18–64: 31.7 %,65+: 9.7 %,
Rank 7: Lithuania, all: 27.8 %,under 6: 31.9 %,6–11: 41.4 %,12–17: 49.6 %,18–64: 28.5 %,65+: 14.4 %,
Rank 7: Slovakia, all: 27.8 %,under 6: 33.5 %,6–11: 29.4 %,12–17: 45.2 %,18–64: 29.0 %,65+: 15.3 %,
Rank 9: Italy, all: 24.3 %,under 6: 29.3 %,6–11: 32.4 %,12–17: 46.9 %,18–64: 28.1 %,65+: 7.6 %,
Rank 10: Estonia, all: 17.9 %,under 6: 26.1 %,6–11: 24.9 %,12–17: 30.8 %,18–64: 18.5 %,65+: 7.4 %,
Rank 11: Czechia, all: 16.7 %,under 6: 22.0 %,6–11: 27.9 %,12–17: 31.5 %,18–64: 16.9 %,65+: 6.0 %,
Rank 12: Sweden, all: 15.7 %,under 6: 22.0 %,6–11: 19.3 %,12–17: 24.0 %,18–64: 17.6 %,65+: 4.4 %,
Rank 13: Hungary, all: 14.6 %,under 6: 20.7 %,6–11: 28.1 %,12–17: 27.4 %,18–64: 14.7 %,65+: 5.0 %,
Rank 14: Austria, all: 14.2 %,under 6: 18.3 %,6–11: 25.0 %,12–17: 24.9 %,18–64: 14.7 %,65+: 4.9 %,
Rank 15: Portugal, all: 12.7 %,under 6: 18.4 %,6–11: 21.4 %,12–17: 23.9 %,18–64: 13.9 %,65+: 4.0 %,
Rank 16: Germany, all: 11.7 %,under 6: 17.4 %,6–11: 17.4 %,12–17: 22.0 %,18–64: 12.6 %,65+: 3.1 %,
Rank 17: France, all: 10.8 %,under 6: 16.1 %,6–11: 17.1 %,12–17: 21.4 %,18–64: 11.3 %,65+: 2.3 %,
Rank 18: Slovenia, all: 10.5 %,under 6: 16.3 %,6–11: 15.7 %,12–17: 18.9 %,18–64: 11.1 %,65+: 3.6 %,
Rank 19: Denmark, all: 9.9 %,under 6: 11.7 %,6–11: 15.1 %,12–17: 11.1 %,18–64: 12.1 %,65+: 1.2 %,
Rank 20: Spain, all: 9.5 %,under 6: 12.7 %,6–11: 14.0 %,12–17: 17.3 %,18–64: 10.2 %,65+: 2.9 %,
Rank 20: Finland, all: 9.5 %,under 6: 9.8 %,6–11: 9.8 %,12–17: 10.7 %,18–64: 11.8 %,65+: 3.2 %,
Rank 22: Luxembourg, all: 8.8 %,under 6: 12.7 %,6–11: 7.7 %,12–17: 12.1 %,18–64: 9.3 %,65+: 2.7 %,
Rank 23: Belgium, all: 6.6 %,under 6: 8.3 %,6–11: 11.9 %,12–17: 15.6 %,18–64: 6.3 %,65+: 1.9 %,
Rank 24: Ireland, all: 5.4 %,under 6: 9.8 %,6–11: 8.7 %,12–17: 10.6 %,18–64: 4.8 %,65+: 1.2 %,
Rank 25: Malta, all: 4.7 %,under 6: 6.5 %,6–11: 6.5 %,12–17: 4.7 %,18–64: 5.6 %,65+: 0.0 %,
Rank 26: Netherlands, all: 4.1 %,under 6: 5.4 %,6–11: 5.8 %,12–17: 5.9 %,18–64: 4.9 %,65+: 0.4 %,
Rank 27: Cyprus, all: 2.2 %,under 6: 3.4 %,6–11: 2.9 %,12–17: 5.8 %,18–64: 2.1 %,65+: 0.5 %,
How to read: one row per country, one column per group, each value in its cell. The stronger the colour, the higher the value. Countries are ranked by the “all” column.Source: Eurostat, Overcrowding rate by age, sex and poverty status - total population (ilc_lvho05a).Chart: Civitascope · CC BY 4.0Download image ·

About the data

The share of people living in an overcrowded household. A household is overcrowded when it has fewer rooms than the minimum for its size and make-up. That minimum is one room for the household, one per couple and one per single person aged 18 or more. Two young people aged 12 to 17 of the same sex share a room, otherwise each has one. Two children under 12 share a room. Kitchens count as rooms, but bathrooms, toilets and passageways do not. A room must be at least 4 square metres.

Eurostat: “The overcrowding rate is defined as the percentage of the population living in an overcrowded household. A person is considered as living in an overcrowded household if the household does not have at its disposal a minimum number of rooms equal to:” (source)

EU statistics on income and living conditions (EU-SILC): a yearly sample survey of households, run by the national statistical institutes.

How to read these numbers

How it is measured

The survey covers people living in private households. People in collective households and institutions are generally not included (Estonia includes collective households).

Provisional figures

Some 2025 values are provisional (flag p) and may be revised.

Sources and data

Eurostat, Overcrowding rate by age, sex and poverty status - total population (ilc_lvho05a). Data updated 20 October 2026, retrieved 29 October 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.

Eurostat metadata · Eurostat methodology

The exact Eurostat API query

https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/api/dissemination/statistics/1.0/data/ilc_lvho05a?format=JSON&lang=en&age=TOTAL&freq=A&geo=AT&geo=BE&geo=BG&geo=CY&geo=CZ&geo=DE&geo=DK&geo=EE&geo=EL&geo=ES&geo=EU27_2020&geo=FI&geo=FR&geo=HR&geo=HU&geo=IE&geo=IT&geo=LT&geo=LU&geo=LV&geo=MT&geo=NL&geo=PL&geo=PT&geo=RO&geo=SE&geo=SI&geo=SK&rskpovth=TOTAL&sex=T&unit=PC

How every number in this story was computed

More in Housing