Search Magyar

Who cannot afford a week's holiday in the EU

Topic: Living conditions

In Romania, 61.4% of people live in a household that cannot afford a one-week annual holiday away from home, against 10.6% in Luxembourg.

In 2025, 27.5% of people in the EU lived in a household that could not afford a one-week annual holiday away from home. Households say this themselves in a survey. A household counts when at least one of its members cannot afford to go.

Figures for:
2025.
Covers:
the time of the survey.
New data:
once a year.
Dataset updated:
20 October 2026.

Published 12 November 2026

The ranking

In 2025, the share of people whose household cannot afford a one-week annual holiday away from home was lowest in Luxembourg, at 10.6%, and highest in Romania, at 61.4%.

Share of people whose household cannot afford a one-week annual holiday away from home, %

2025
020406080%
EU, 27.5%
Rank 1: Romania, 61.4%
Rank 2: Greece, 46.6%
Rank 3: Bulgaria, 39.1%
Rank 3: Hungary, 39.1%
Rank 5: Italy, 35.7%
Rank 6: Portugal, 33.1%
Rank 7: Croatia, 32.6%
Rank 8: Spain, 32.2%
Rank 9: Lithuania, 30.9%
Rank 10: Slovakia, 29.1%
Rank 11: Latvia, 28.9%
Rank 12: Cyprus, 27.6%
Rank 12: Malta, 27.6%
Rank 14: Estonia, 25.8%
Rank 15: Poland, 24.5%
Rank 16: France, 23.2%
Rank 17: Germany, 20.9%
Rank 18: Ireland, 20.5%
Rank 19: Belgium, 19.5%
Rank 20: Czechia, 19.0%
Rank 21: Austria, 17.8%
Rank 22: Slovenia, 15.2%
Rank 23: Finland, 14.8%
Rank 24: Denmark, 14.1%
Rank 25: Netherlands, 12.8%
Rank 26: Sweden, 12.4%
Rank 27: Luxembourg, 10.6%
How to read: bars start at zero. Every country with a value is shown, ranked from highest to lowest, and the EU in the first row.The value for Lithuania is provisional.Source: Eurostat, Inability to afford paying for one week annual holiday away from home (ilc_mdes02).Chart: Civitascope (civitascope.eu) · CC BY 4.0 · Download image · Download data ·

Above and below the at-risk-of-poverty threshold

Among people above the at-risk-of-poverty threshold, the gap between the highest and the lowest country was slightly narrower than among the whole population. Romania was again the highest, at 55.0%, and Luxembourg again the lowest, at 7.4%. The highest and the lowest were 47.6 percentage points apart.

Among people at risk of poverty, the gap between the highest and the lowest country was wider than among people above the at-risk-of-poverty threshold. Romania was again the highest, at 89.8%, and Denmark the lowest, at 28.9%. The gap between the highest and the lowest was 60.9 percentage points.

Share of people whose household cannot afford a one-week annual holiday away from home: above the threshold and at risk of poverty, %

2025
Above the thresholdAt risk of povertyAt risk of poverty − above the thresholdDifference
20406080pp
EU, Above the threshold: 21.9%, At risk of poverty: 56.2%, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +34.3 pp
Rank 1: Romania, Above the threshold: 55.0%, At risk of poverty: 89.8%, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +34.8 pp
Rank 2: Greece, Above the threshold: 37.9%, At risk of poverty: 82.5%, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +44.6 pp
Rank 3: Hungary, Above the threshold: 33.8%, At risk of poverty: 71.8%, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +38.0 pp
Rank 4: Bulgaria, Above the threshold: 30.7%, At risk of poverty: 70.1%, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +39.4 pp
Rank 5: Cyprus, Above the threshold: 20.9%, At risk of poverty: 65.7%, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +44.8 pp
Rank 6: Portugal, Above the threshold: 27.4%, At risk of poverty: 64.6%, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +37.2 pp
Rank 7: Croatia, Above the threshold: 25.1%, At risk of poverty: 63.6%, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +38.5 pp
Rank 8: Italy, Above the threshold: 29.4%, At risk of poverty: 63.2%, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +33.8 pp
Rank 9: Slovakia, Above the threshold: 24.6%, At risk of poverty: 61.5%, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +36.9 pp
Rank 10: Lithuania, Above the threshold: 22.3%, At risk of poverty: 60.1%, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +37.8 pp
Rank 11: Spain, Above the threshold: 26.5%, At risk of poverty: 55.9%, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +29.4 pp
Rank 12: Czechia, Above the threshold: 15.1%, At risk of poverty: 55.7%, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +40.6 pp
Rank 13: Latvia, Above the threshold: 21.7%, At risk of poverty: 54.3%, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +32.6 pp
Rank 14: France, Above the threshold: 17.4%, At risk of poverty: 53.0%, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +35.6 pp
Rank 15: Malta, Above the threshold: 22.5%, At risk of poverty: 52.5%, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +30.0 pp
Rank 16: Belgium, Above the threshold: 15.6%, At risk of poverty: 52.0%, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +36.4 pp
Rank 17: Poland, Above the threshold: 20.7%, At risk of poverty: 49.8%, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +29.1 pp
Rank 17: Germany, Above the threshold: 15.4%, At risk of poverty: 49.8%, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +34.4 pp
Rank 19: Ireland, Above the threshold: 16.4%, At risk of poverty: 48.3%, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +31.9 pp
Rank 20: Estonia, Above the threshold: 20.6%, At risk of poverty: 47.1%, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +26.5 pp
Rank 21: Slovenia, Above the threshold: 11.0%, At risk of poverty: 40.2%, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +29.2 pp
Rank 22: Finland, Above the threshold: 11.1%, At risk of poverty: 38.9%, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +27.8 pp
Rank 23: Netherlands, Above the threshold: 9.2%, At risk of poverty: 38.2%, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +29.0 pp
Rank 24: Austria, Above the threshold: 13.9%, At risk of poverty: 38.1%, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +24.2 pp
Rank 25: Sweden, Above the threshold: 9.0%, At risk of poverty: 31.1%, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +22.1 pp
Rank 26: Luxembourg, Above the threshold: 7.4%, At risk of poverty: 29.5%, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +22.1 pp
Rank 27: Denmark, Above the threshold: 12.1%, At risk of poverty: 28.9%, At risk of poverty − above the threshold: +16.8 pp
How to read: the filled dot (at risk of poverty) and the outlined dot (above the threshold) each have their value beside them. The column on the right is their difference, at risk of poverty − above the threshold. Countries are ranked by the filled dot.The value for Lithuania is provisional.Source: Eurostat, Inability to afford paying for one week annual holiday away from home (ilc_mdes02).Chart: Civitascope (civitascope.eu) · CC BY 4.0 · Download image · Download data ·
EveryoneAbove the thresholdAt risk of poverty
Lowest10.6%Luxembourg7.4%Luxembourg28.9%Denmark
Highest61.4%Romania55.0%Romania89.8%Romania
Highest − lowest50.8 pp47.6 pp60.9 pp

Everyone

Lowest: 10.6% (Luxembourg)Highest: 61.4% (Romania)Highest − lowest: 50.8 pp

Above the threshold

Lowest: 7.4% (Luxembourg)Highest: 55.0% (Romania)Highest − lowest: 47.6 pp

At risk of poverty

Lowest: 28.9% (Denmark)Highest: 89.8% (Romania)Highest − lowest: 60.9 pp

Household types

In 2025, 41.5% of people in single-parent households in the EU could not afford a one-week annual holiday away from home, against 22.6% of people in households of two adults without dependent children.

Share of people whose household cannot afford a one-week annual holiday away from home, by household type, %

2025
everyonealone, under 65alone, 65+1 adult, dependent children2 adults, 3+ dependent children2 adults, no dependent children
EU, everyone: 27.5%,alone, under 65: 29.9%,alone, 65+: 38.6%,1 adult, dependent children: 41.5%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 30.6%,2 adults, no dependent children: 22.6%,
Rank 1: Romania, everyone: 61.4%,alone, under 65: 64.5%,alone, 65+: 89.2%,1 adult, dependent children: 76.2%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 69.7%,2 adults, no dependent children: 65.8%,
Rank 2: Greece, everyone: 46.6%,alone, under 65: 43.5%,alone, 65+: 64.2%,1 adult, dependent children: 61.6%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 50.7%,2 adults, no dependent children: 45.6%,
Rank 3: Bulgaria, everyone: 39.1%,alone, under 65: 34.9%,alone, 65+: 69.5%,1 adult, dependent children: 42.8%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 57.4%,2 adults, no dependent children: 43.1%,
Rank 3: Hungary, everyone: 39.1%,alone, under 65: 34.8%,alone, 65+: 53.9%,1 adult, dependent children: 47.8%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 39.6%,2 adults, no dependent children: 36.2%,
Rank 5: Italy, everyone: 35.7%,alone, under 65: 36.6%,alone, 65+: 48.1%,1 adult, dependent children: 46.3%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 46.6%,2 adults, no dependent children: 32.6%,
Rank 6: Portugal, everyone: 33.1%,alone, under 65: 29.6%,alone, 65+: 45.8%,1 adult, dependent children: 44.7%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 29.6%,2 adults, no dependent children: 35.9%,
Rank 7: Croatia, everyone: 32.6%,alone, under 65: 36.8%,alone, 65+: 62.6%,1 adult, dependent children: 34.3%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 33.1%,2 adults, no dependent children: 41.5%,
Rank 8: Spain, everyone: 32.2%,alone, under 65: 33.4%,alone, 65+: 35.6%,1 adult, dependent children: 47.5%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 38.1%,2 adults, no dependent children: 26.4%,
Rank 9: Lithuania, everyone: 30.9%,alone, under 65: 29.2%,alone, 65+: 50.5%,1 adult, dependent children: 31.5%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 47.8%,2 adults, no dependent children: 31.4%,
Rank 10: Slovakia, everyone: 29.1%,alone, under 65: 25.5%,alone, 65+: 51.3%,1 adult, dependent children: 34.6%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 30.8%,2 adults, no dependent children: 29.1%,
Rank 11: Latvia, everyone: 28.9%,alone, under 65: 26.8%,alone, 65+: 52.8%,1 adult, dependent children: 25.6%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 22.5%,2 adults, no dependent children: 32.8%,
Rank 12: Cyprus, everyone: 27.6%,alone, under 65: 22.9%,alone, 65+: 36.0%,1 adult, dependent children: 50.2%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 33.5%,2 adults, no dependent children: 26.5%,
Rank 12: Malta, everyone: 27.6%,alone, under 65: 28.9%,alone, 65+: 37.7%,1 adult, dependent children: 53.0%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 45.7%,2 adults, no dependent children: 22.7%,
Rank 14: Estonia, everyone: 25.8%,alone, under 65: 22.9%,alone, 65+: 40.0%,1 adult, dependent children: 43.4%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 31.5%,2 adults, no dependent children: 22.5%,
Rank 15: Poland, everyone: 24.5%,alone, under 65: 21.5%,alone, 65+: 41.1%,1 adult, dependent children: 35.0%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 21.0%,2 adults, no dependent children: 21.9%,
Rank 16: France, everyone: 23.2%,alone, under 65: 27.5%,alone, 65+: 32.9%,1 adult, dependent children: 41.4%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 28.7%,2 adults, no dependent children: 16.7%,
Rank 17: Germany, everyone: 20.9%,alone, under 65: 29.4%,alone, 65+: 29.0%,1 adult, dependent children: 39.3%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 27.0%,2 adults, no dependent children: 15.6%,
Rank 18: Ireland, everyone: 20.5%,alone, under 65: 27.0%,alone, 65+: 28.5%,1 adult, dependent children: 42.3%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 26.9%,2 adults, no dependent children: 12.9%,
Rank 19: Belgium, everyone: 19.5%,alone, under 65: 28.9%,alone, 65+: 27.1%,1 adult, dependent children: 37.1%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 23.0%,2 adults, no dependent children: 12.0%,
Rank 20: Czechia, everyone: 19.0%,alone, under 65: 19.6%,alone, 65+: 30.7%,1 adult, dependent children: 37.4%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 31.4%,2 adults, no dependent children: 13.4%,
Rank 21: Austria, everyone: 17.8%,alone, under 65: 24.7%,alone, 65+: 27.4%,1 adult, dependent children: 43.2%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 17.6%,2 adults, no dependent children: 10.3%,
Rank 22: Slovenia, everyone: 15.2%,alone, under 65: 20.2%,alone, 65+: 38.6%,1 adult, dependent children: 26.2%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 9.9%,2 adults, no dependent children: 18.9%,
Rank 23: Finland, everyone: 14.8%,alone, under 65: 24.4%,alone, 65+: 19.2%,1 adult, dependent children: 28.4%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 17.7%,2 adults, no dependent children: 8.6%,
Rank 24: Denmark, everyone: 14.1%,alone, under 65: 22.5%,alone, 65+: 19.3%,1 adult, dependent children: 29.6%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 9.7%,2 adults, no dependent children: 11.3%,
Rank 25: Netherlands, everyone: 12.8%,alone, under 65: 23.3%,alone, 65+: 20.4%,1 adult, dependent children: 38.2%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 14.6%,2 adults, no dependent children: 9.2%,
Rank 26: Sweden, everyone: 12.4%,alone, under 65: 17.9%,alone, 65+: 13.8%,1 adult, dependent children: 25.6%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 15.4%,2 adults, no dependent children: 6.8%,
Rank 27: Luxembourg, everyone: 10.6%,alone, under 65: 13.1%,alone, 65+: 6.9%,1 adult, dependent children: 26.3%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 13.0%,2 adults, no dependent children: 6.2%,
everyonealone, under 65alone, 65+1 adult, dependent children
EU, everyone: 27.5%,alone, under 65: 29.9%,alone, 65+: 38.6%,1 adult, dependent children: 41.5%,
Rank 1: Romania, everyone: 61.4%,alone, under 65: 64.5%,alone, 65+: 89.2%,1 adult, dependent children: 76.2%,
Rank 2: Greece, everyone: 46.6%,alone, under 65: 43.5%,alone, 65+: 64.2%,1 adult, dependent children: 61.6%,
Rank 3: Bulgaria, everyone: 39.1%,alone, under 65: 34.9%,alone, 65+: 69.5%,1 adult, dependent children: 42.8%,
Rank 3: Hungary, everyone: 39.1%,alone, under 65: 34.8%,alone, 65+: 53.9%,1 adult, dependent children: 47.8%,
Rank 5: Italy, everyone: 35.7%,alone, under 65: 36.6%,alone, 65+: 48.1%,1 adult, dependent children: 46.3%,
Rank 6: Portugal, everyone: 33.1%,alone, under 65: 29.6%,alone, 65+: 45.8%,1 adult, dependent children: 44.7%,
Rank 7: Croatia, everyone: 32.6%,alone, under 65: 36.8%,alone, 65+: 62.6%,1 adult, dependent children: 34.3%,
Rank 8: Spain, everyone: 32.2%,alone, under 65: 33.4%,alone, 65+: 35.6%,1 adult, dependent children: 47.5%,
Rank 9: Lithuania, everyone: 30.9%,alone, under 65: 29.2%,alone, 65+: 50.5%,1 adult, dependent children: 31.5%,
Rank 10: Slovakia, everyone: 29.1%,alone, under 65: 25.5%,alone, 65+: 51.3%,1 adult, dependent children: 34.6%,
Rank 11: Latvia, everyone: 28.9%,alone, under 65: 26.8%,alone, 65+: 52.8%,1 adult, dependent children: 25.6%,
Rank 12: Cyprus, everyone: 27.6%,alone, under 65: 22.9%,alone, 65+: 36.0%,1 adult, dependent children: 50.2%,
Rank 12: Malta, everyone: 27.6%,alone, under 65: 28.9%,alone, 65+: 37.7%,1 adult, dependent children: 53.0%,
Rank 14: Estonia, everyone: 25.8%,alone, under 65: 22.9%,alone, 65+: 40.0%,1 adult, dependent children: 43.4%,
Rank 15: Poland, everyone: 24.5%,alone, under 65: 21.5%,alone, 65+: 41.1%,1 adult, dependent children: 35.0%,
Rank 16: France, everyone: 23.2%,alone, under 65: 27.5%,alone, 65+: 32.9%,1 adult, dependent children: 41.4%,
Rank 17: Germany, everyone: 20.9%,alone, under 65: 29.4%,alone, 65+: 29.0%,1 adult, dependent children: 39.3%,
Rank 18: Ireland, everyone: 20.5%,alone, under 65: 27.0%,alone, 65+: 28.5%,1 adult, dependent children: 42.3%,
Rank 19: Belgium, everyone: 19.5%,alone, under 65: 28.9%,alone, 65+: 27.1%,1 adult, dependent children: 37.1%,
Rank 20: Czechia, everyone: 19.0%,alone, under 65: 19.6%,alone, 65+: 30.7%,1 adult, dependent children: 37.4%,
Rank 21: Austria, everyone: 17.8%,alone, under 65: 24.7%,alone, 65+: 27.4%,1 adult, dependent children: 43.2%,
Rank 22: Slovenia, everyone: 15.2%,alone, under 65: 20.2%,alone, 65+: 38.6%,1 adult, dependent children: 26.2%,
Rank 23: Finland, everyone: 14.8%,alone, under 65: 24.4%,alone, 65+: 19.2%,1 adult, dependent children: 28.4%,
Rank 24: Denmark, everyone: 14.1%,alone, under 65: 22.5%,alone, 65+: 19.3%,1 adult, dependent children: 29.6%,
Rank 25: Netherlands, everyone: 12.8%,alone, under 65: 23.3%,alone, 65+: 20.4%,1 adult, dependent children: 38.2%,
Rank 26: Sweden, everyone: 12.4%,alone, under 65: 17.9%,alone, 65+: 13.8%,1 adult, dependent children: 25.6%,
Rank 27: Luxembourg, everyone: 10.6%,alone, under 65: 13.1%,alone, 65+: 6.9%,1 adult, dependent children: 26.3%,
everyone2 adults, 3+ dependent children2 adults, no dependent children
EU, everyone: 27.5%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 30.6%,2 adults, no dependent children: 22.6%,
Rank 1: Romania, everyone: 61.4%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 69.7%,2 adults, no dependent children: 65.8%,
Rank 2: Greece, everyone: 46.6%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 50.7%,2 adults, no dependent children: 45.6%,
Rank 3: Bulgaria, everyone: 39.1%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 57.4%,2 adults, no dependent children: 43.1%,
Rank 3: Hungary, everyone: 39.1%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 39.6%,2 adults, no dependent children: 36.2%,
Rank 5: Italy, everyone: 35.7%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 46.6%,2 adults, no dependent children: 32.6%,
Rank 6: Portugal, everyone: 33.1%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 29.6%,2 adults, no dependent children: 35.9%,
Rank 7: Croatia, everyone: 32.6%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 33.1%,2 adults, no dependent children: 41.5%,
Rank 8: Spain, everyone: 32.2%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 38.1%,2 adults, no dependent children: 26.4%,
Rank 9: Lithuania, everyone: 30.9%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 47.8%,2 adults, no dependent children: 31.4%,
Rank 10: Slovakia, everyone: 29.1%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 30.8%,2 adults, no dependent children: 29.1%,
Rank 11: Latvia, everyone: 28.9%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 22.5%,2 adults, no dependent children: 32.8%,
Rank 12: Cyprus, everyone: 27.6%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 33.5%,2 adults, no dependent children: 26.5%,
Rank 12: Malta, everyone: 27.6%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 45.7%,2 adults, no dependent children: 22.7%,
Rank 14: Estonia, everyone: 25.8%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 31.5%,2 adults, no dependent children: 22.5%,
Rank 15: Poland, everyone: 24.5%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 21.0%,2 adults, no dependent children: 21.9%,
Rank 16: France, everyone: 23.2%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 28.7%,2 adults, no dependent children: 16.7%,
Rank 17: Germany, everyone: 20.9%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 27.0%,2 adults, no dependent children: 15.6%,
Rank 18: Ireland, everyone: 20.5%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 26.9%,2 adults, no dependent children: 12.9%,
Rank 19: Belgium, everyone: 19.5%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 23.0%,2 adults, no dependent children: 12.0%,
Rank 20: Czechia, everyone: 19.0%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 31.4%,2 adults, no dependent children: 13.4%,
Rank 21: Austria, everyone: 17.8%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 17.6%,2 adults, no dependent children: 10.3%,
Rank 22: Slovenia, everyone: 15.2%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 9.9%,2 adults, no dependent children: 18.9%,
Rank 23: Finland, everyone: 14.8%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 17.7%,2 adults, no dependent children: 8.6%,
Rank 24: Denmark, everyone: 14.1%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 9.7%,2 adults, no dependent children: 11.3%,
Rank 25: Netherlands, everyone: 12.8%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 14.6%,2 adults, no dependent children: 9.2%,
Rank 26: Sweden, everyone: 12.4%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 15.4%,2 adults, no dependent children: 6.8%,
Rank 27: Luxembourg, everyone: 10.6%,2 adults, 3+ dependent children: 13.0%,2 adults, no dependent children: 6.2%,
How to read: one row per country, one column per group, each value in its cell. The stronger the colour, the higher the value. Countries are ranked by the “everyone” column.The value for Lithuania is provisional.Source: Eurostat, Inability to afford paying for one week annual holiday away from home (ilc_mdes02).Chart: Civitascope (civitascope.eu) · CC BY 4.0 · Download image · Download data ·

About the data

The share of people living in private households who say that their household cannot afford to pay for a one-week annual holiday away from home.

Eurostat: “The inability to afford paying for one-week annual holiday away from home refers to the percentage of persons in the total population who are in the state of enforced inability to afford to pay for one-week annual holiday away from home.” (source)

EU statistics on income and living conditions (EU-SILC), a yearly sample survey of households run by the national statistical institutes. The answer is the household's own assessment, and every member of the household is counted with it.

How to read these numbers

How it is measured

The survey covers people living in private households. People in collective households and institutions are generally not included.

The figure is what households say about themselves. A household counts as unable to afford the holiday if at least one of its members cannot afford to go. A holiday paid by borrowing counts as afforded. Members who could pay but cannot go for health or other reasons do not make the household count.

The figure is about whether households can afford a holiday, not whether people travelled. Eurostat's tourism statistics count residents aged 15 or over who made no trip of four nights or more, for whatever reason, and give a different share.

France's figures cover the European part of the country and, since 2022, four overseas departments (Guadeloupe, Martinique, French Guiana and Réunion). Mayotte is not included. Portugal's figures include the Azores and Madeira. Cyprus's figures cover only the areas controlled by the government of the Republic of Cyprus.

Dependent children are people aged 0 to 17, and those aged 18 to 24 if they are economically inactive, who live with at least one parent.

Provisional figures

A provisional value (flag p) may still be revised. This concerns Lithuania (2025).

Sources and data

Eurostat, Inability to afford paying for one week annual holiday away from home (ilc_mdes02). Data updated 20 October 2026, retrieved 12 November 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.

Eurostat metadata · Eurostat methodology

The exact Eurostat API query

https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/api/dissemination/statistics/1.0/data/ilc_mdes02?format=JSON&lang=en&freq=A&geo=AT&geo=BE&geo=BG&geo=CY&geo=CZ&geo=DE&geo=DK&geo=EE&geo=EL&geo=ES&geo=EU27_2020&geo=FI&geo=FR&geo=HR&geo=HU&geo=IE&geo=IT&geo=LT&geo=LU&geo=LV&geo=MT&geo=NL&geo=PL&geo=PT&geo=RO&geo=SE&geo=SI&geo=SK&hhcomp=TOTAL&rskpovth=TOTAL&unit=PC

How every number in this story was computed

Report an error: contact [at] civitascope.eu

Related stories

All stories in Living conditions